Looking for the best AI inference software? Running AI models in production requires infrastructure that balances speed, cost, and reliability. Whether you're serving LLM predictions, processing images with vision models, or handling multimodal requests, your inference provider determines whether users get sub-second responses or frustrating delays.
Our testing team has compared the top AI inference software providers so you don't have to. AI inference platforms host trained machine learning models and serve predictions through API, handling the compute-intensive work of running neural networks at scale. These platforms abstract away GPU provisioning, load balancing, and auto-scaling. That means you can focus on building applications instead of managing infrastructure.
In this guide, you'll find our ranked list of the best AI inference software solutions for 2026, with honest pros and cons, pricing models, and our expert verdict on each platform. AI adoption is accelerating across industries. Choosing an inference provider that matches your latency, throughput, and budget requirements is an infrastructure decision that directly impacts user experience and operational costs.
Our AI analysts benchmark inference providers using standardized workloads across LLM, vision, and multimodal models, measuring latency percentiles and cost efficiency. Our editorial content is not influenced by advertisers.
✓
H100 and A100 GPUs available across multiple regions for low-latency inference
✓
OpenAI-compatible APIs with support for 100+ open-source and proprietary models
✓
Sub-100ms latency for edge inference workloads via global CDN integration
✓
Transparent per-token and per-second pricing with reserved capacity discounts
Summary of the best AI inference software providers
The AI inference software landscape in 2026 comes down to three things: GPU availability, model support, and pricing transparency. Top-tier providers offer H100 and A100 GPUs for demanding LLM workloads, while budget-friendly options use L4 and T4 chips for vision and smaller language models. Throughput varies dramatically, you'll see 50-150 tokens per second for Llama 3 70B on modern hardware, with batch inference delivering 5-10x effectiveness gains for non-real-time workloads. OpenAI-compatible APIs are now standard, while fine-tuning support and multi-region deployment separate enterprise platforms from basic inference services.
Pricing models range from per-token metering (typically $0.10-$2.00 per million tokens depending on model size) to per-second compute charges and reserved capacity discounts. The providers that excel in 2026 combine transparent pricing with predictable performance and complete model libraries spanning text, vision, audio, and multimodal architectures.
For businesses serious about production AI deployment, Gcore delivers the complete package. Their global edge network, diverse GPU inventory, and performance-first architecture make them our top-ranked AI inference software provider for 2026. Explore Gcore's inference platform to see how distributed GPU infrastructure can transform your AI applications.
Ready to get started?
Try Gcore AI Inference →
❌ None
No CDN integration
From $0.02/req
175+ locations
Multiple regions
❌ None
No CDN integration
From $0.08/GB
Edge computing
Multiple regions
❌ None
No CDN integration
From $0.20/M tok
Fast inference
Multiple regions
❌ None
No CDN integration
From $0.23/M tok
Cloud & on-prem
Multiple regions
❌ None
No CDN integration
Multiple regions
❌ None
No CDN integration
From $0.01/req
Edge compute
Multiple regions
❌ None
No CDN integration
From $0.60/M req
Global edge
Multiple regions
The top 10 best AI inference software solutions for 2026
Gcore offers the most comprehensive AI inference platform with specialized NVIDIA L40S GPU infrastructure and global deployment capabilities, delivering exceptional performance for enterprise AI workloads.
- Advanced GPU optimization (L40S, A100, H100)
- Global inference network
- Enterprise-grade reliability
- Comprehensive API support
- Starting Price: ~$700/mo
- Model: L40s hourly
- Best For: Organizations requiring high-performance AI inference with enterprise scalability
Pros
- 210+ global PoPs enable sub-20ms latency worldwide
- Integrated CDN and edge compute on unified platform
- Native AI inference at edge with GPU availability
- Transparent pricing with no egress fees for CDN
- Strong presence in underserved APAC and LATAM regions
Cons
- Smaller ecosystem compared to AWS/Azure/GCP marketplace options
- Limited third-party integration and tooling documentation
- Newer managed services lack feature parity with hyperscalers
High-performance infrastructure
- Starting Price: From $0.02/req
- Model: 175+ locations
- Best For: Businesses of all sizes
Pros
- Global edge deployment with <50ms latency in 300+ cities
- Zero cold starts with persistent model loading across network
- Pay-per-request pricing with no idle infrastructure costs
- Pre-loaded popular models (Llama, Mistral) ready without setup
- Seamless integration with Workers, Pages, and existing Cloudflare stack
Cons
- Limited model selection compared to AWS/GCP AI catalogs
- Cannot bring custom fine-tuned models to platform
- Shorter execution timeouts than traditional cloud inference endpoints
High-performance infrastructure
- Starting Price: From $0.08/GB
- Model: Edge computing
- Best For: Businesses of all sizes
Pros
- Leverages existing 300,000+ edge servers for low-latency inference
- Built-in DDoS protection and enterprise-grade security infrastructure
- Seamless integration with existing Akamai CDN and media workflows
- Strong performance for real-time applications requiring <50ms latency
- Predictable egress costs due to established CDN pricing model
Cons
- Limited model selection compared to AWS/Azure AI catalogs
- Newer AI platform with less community documentation available
- Primarily optimized for inference, not model training workflows
Groq delivers unmatched inference speed with custom LPU hardware, making it ideal for applications where response time is critical.
- 840 tokens per second throughput
- Custom LPU hardware design
- Deterministic processing
- Sub-millisecond latency
- Starting Price: $0.03/M
- Model: tokens
- Best For: High-throughput LLM inference applications requiring maximum speed
Pros
- LPU architecture delivers 10-100x faster inference than GPUs
- Sub-second response times for large language model queries
- Deterministic latency with minimal variance between requests
- Cost-effective tokens per second compared to GPU providers
- Simple API compatible with OpenAI SDK standards
Cons
- Limited model selection compared to traditional GPU providers
- No fine-tuning or custom model training capabilities
- Newer platform with less enterprise deployment history
Largest independent GPU cluster, 200+ open-source models, 4x faster inference
- Starting Price: $0.008/M
- Model: embeddings
- Best For: Open-source model deployment, custom fine-tuning, and large-scale inference
Pros
- Access to latest open-source models like Llama, Mistral, Qwen
- Pay-per-token pricing without minimum commitments or subscriptions
- Fast inference with sub-second response times on optimized infrastructure
- Free tier includes $25 credit for testing models
- Simple API compatible with OpenAI SDK for easy migration
Cons
- Limited enterprise SLA guarantees compared to major cloud providers
- Smaller model selection than proprietary API services like OpenAI
- Documentation less comprehensive than established cloud platforms
High-performance infrastructure
- Starting Price: From $0.20/M tok
- Model: Fast inference
- Best For: Businesses of all sizes
Pros
- Sub-second cold start times for production model deployment
- Competitive pricing at $0.20-$0.90 per million tokens
- Native support for function calling and structured outputs
- Optimized inference for Llama, Mistral, and Mixtral models
- Enterprise-grade SLAs with 99.9% uptime guarantees
Cons
- Smaller model catalog compared to larger cloud providers
- Limited fine-tuning capabilities for custom model variants
- Fewer geographic regions than AWS or Azure
High-performance infrastructure
- Starting Price: From $0.23/M tok
- Model: Cloud & on-prem
- Best For: Businesses of all sizes
Pros
- Pay-per-second billing with automatic scaling to zero
- Pre-built models deploy via simple API calls
- Custom model deployment using Cog containerization framework
- Hardware flexibility includes A100s and T4s
- Version control built-in for model iterations
Cons
- Cold starts can add 10-60 seconds latency
- Limited control over underlying infrastructure configuration
- Higher per-inference cost than self-hosted alternatives
High-performance infrastructure
- Starting Price: From $0.50/h
- Model: Serverless
- Best For: Businesses of all sizes
Pros
- Automatic scaling to zero reduces costs during idle periods
- Native Cloud SQL and Secret Manager integration simplifies configuration
- Request-based pricing granular to nearest 100ms of execution
- Supports any language/framework via standard container images
- Built-in traffic splitting enables gradual rollouts and A/B testing
Cons
- 15-minute maximum request timeout limits long-running operations
- Cold starts can reach 2-5 seconds for larger containers
- Limited to HTTP/gRPC protocols, no WebSocket support
High-performance infrastructure
- Starting Price: From $0.01/req
- Model: Edge compute
- Best For: Businesses of all sizes
Pros
- Sub-millisecond cold start times with WebAssembly runtime
- Supports multiple languages compiled to Wasm (Rust, JavaScript, Go)
- Real-time log streaming with microsecond-level granularity
- No egress fees for bandwidth usage
- Strong CDN heritage with integrated edge caching capabilities
Cons
- Smaller ecosystem compared to AWS Lambda or Cloudflare Workers
- 35MB memory limit per request restricts complex applications
- Steeper learning curve for WebAssembly compilation toolchain
High-performance infrastructure
- Starting Price: From $0.60/M req
- Model: Global edge
- Best For: Businesses of all sizes
Pros
- Native CloudFront integration with 225+ global edge locations
- Access to AWS services via IAM roles and VPC
- No server management with automatic scaling per location
- Sub-millisecond cold starts for viewer request/response triggers
- Pay only per request with no minimum fees
Cons
- 1MB package size limit restricts complex dependencies
- Maximum 5-second execution timeout at origin triggers
- No environment variables or layers support like standard Lambda
Frequently Asked Questions
What is AI inference software and why does it matter?
▼
AI inference software provides the infrastructure to run trained machine learning models in production, serving predictions through API without requiring you to manage GPUs, scaling, or deployment. It matters because inference typically accounts for 80-90% of AI compute costs in production. The right platform directly impacts response times, reliability, and operational expenses for any AI-powered application.
How do you compare AI inference providers effectively?
▼
Compare providers on five key dimensions: GPU availability (H100s for large LLMs, L4s for vision), model library breadth (LLMs, vision, audio, multimodal), throughput metrics (tokens per second for your target models), API compatibility (OpenAI-compatible endpoints simplify migration), and pricing transparency (per-token vs. per-second with clear rate cards). You'll want to run benchmarks with your actual models and traffic patterns before committing to annual contracts.
Which GPUs deliver the best inference performance in 2026?
▼
NVIDIA H100 GPUs lead for large language model inference, delivering 2-3x the throughput of A100s for models like Llama 3 70B and GPT-4 class architectures. For vision models and smaller LLMs (7B-13B parameters), L4 GPUs offer excellent price-performance. T4s remain viable for budget-conscious deployments with moderate throughput requirements.
How do AI inference pricing models compare across providers?
▼
Most providers use per-token pricing ($0.10-$2.00 per million tokens depending on model size) or per-second compute charges ($0.0001-$0.01 per second depending on GPU type). Reserved capacity typically offers 30-50% discounts for committed usage. Spot and preemptible instances can save you 60-80% if your workloads can handle interruptions. Watch for hidden costs like data transfer fees and minimum billing increments, they can inflate your actual costs quickly.
What's the difference between batch and real-time inference?
▼
Real-time inference processes requests individually as they arrive, optimizing for low latency (typically under 100ms). Batch inference takes a different approach: it groups multiple predictions together for processing, which improves throughput and cuts costs.
If your workload can tolerate delays, anywhere from minutes to hours, batch inference delivers 5-10x better cost-per-prediction. That makes it ideal for data processing pipelines. Real-time inference, on the other hand, is essential when you're building interactive applications that need immediate responses.
Which AI inference software is best for most businesses?
▼
Gcore offers the best balance of performance, model support, and transparent pricing for most businesses in 2026. Their global edge infrastructure delivers low-latency inference across regions, while their diverse GPU inventory supports everything from lightweight vision models to demanding LLM workloads. Their OpenAI-compatible API makes it simple to integrate with existing applications.
How do you get started with an AI inference provider?
▼
Start by identifying your model requirements: architecture, parameter count, and expected throughput. Then create accounts with 2-3 providers that offer free tiers or trial credits. Deploy your model or use pre-hosted versions, run benchmarks measuring latency and throughput under realistic load, and compare actual costs based on your traffic patterns before you scale to production volumes.
Conclusion
Choosing the right AI inference software comes down to matching your specific requirements, model types, latency targets, throughput needs, and budget constraints, with what providers actually deliver. If you're running customer-facing applications where every millisecond counts, prioritize providers with edge deployment and premium GPUs. For batch processing and internal tools, focus on cost-per-token effectiveness and batch inference support. Don't overlook API compatibility and model library depth, especially if you plan to experiment with multiple architectures.
Gcore is our top recommendation for 2026 because they've built their inference platform on global edge infrastructure, giving you both performance and flexibility. Their combination of diverse GPU options, complete model support, and transparent pricing makes them the smart choice for businesses scaling AI workloads. Start with Gcore's inference platform and see what purpose-built AI infrastructure does for production deployments.
Try Gcore AI Inference →
